William B. Meyer - Page 2




                                                - 2 -                                                  
                  (2000), the Court lacks jurisdiction to review the                                   
                  disputed determination letters because the Court lacks                               
                  jurisdiction over the underlying taxes (frivolous                                    
                  return penalty under sec. 6702).  Ps filed oppositions                               
                  to R's motions asserting that the cases should be                                    
                  dismissed on the ground that the determination letters                               
                  are invalid.                                                                         
                        Held:  R's motions to dismiss will be denied.                                  
                  Held, further,:  These cases will be dismissed on the                                
                  ground that the determination letters are invalid.                                   


                  William B. Meyer and Diane S. Meyer, pro se.                                         
                  Katrine Shelton and Richard Goldman, for respondent.                                 
                                               OPINION                                                 
            DAWSON, Judge:  These cases were assigned to Chief Special                                 
            Trial Judge Peter J. Panuthos pursuant to the provisions of                                
            section 7443A(b)(4).2  The Court agrees with and adopts the                                
            opinion of the Special Trial Judge, which is set forth below.                              
                              OPINION OF THE SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE                                       
                  PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial Judge:  These cases are before                         
            the Court on respondent's Motions to Dismiss for Lack of                                   
            Jurisdiction, as supplemented.  As discussed in detail below, we                           
            will dismiss these cases for lack of jurisdiction on the ground                            
            that respondent's Notices of Determination Concerning Collection                           
            Action are invalid.                                                                        


            2  Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to                               
            the Internal Revenue Code.  All Rule references are to the Tax                             
            Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.                                                     






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011