Larry Charles Miller - Page 5




                                                - 5 -                                                  

            that he did not really have $72,516 and $15,956.97 in office                               
            expenditures as he claimed on his returns and that his claimed                             
            office expense deductions were false.                                                      
                  According to petitioner, the sources of nontaxable items                             
            that he included in his 1993 gross receipts are:  $6,250 in life                           
            insurance proceeds from Cigna,4 $1,266 in life insurance proceeds                          
            from Minnesota Life Insurance,5 and $65,000 in loan proceeds from                          
            Sinh Hang.6  Additionally, petitioner asserts that the sources of                          
            nontaxable items that he included in his 1994 gross receipts are:                          






                  4Petitioner produced a copy of a death certificate for Ms.                           
            Aretha Payne and a life insurance certificate schedule issued by                           
            the Life Insurance Co. of North America reflecting a policy limit                          
            of $25,000 on the life of Aretha Payne.  Petitioner testified                              
            that upon the death of his mother, he and his three siblings                               
            shared the proceeds from the $25,000 policy equally. However, the                          
            life insurance certificate does not indicate who benefits under                            
            the policy.                                                                                
                  5Petitioner testified that he received $1,266 from Minnesota                         
            Life Insurance.                                                                            
                  6Petitioner produced a copy of a loan agreement for $65,000                          
            dated Nov. 1, 1993.  The loan agreement consists of a one-page,                            
            unnotarized document between petitioner and one of his clients,                            
            Sinh Hang.  While the agreement does indicate a willingness on                             
            the part of Mr. Hang to lend petitioner $65,000 in 1993, it does                           
            not demonstrate that petitioner received $65,000 in loan                                   
            proceeds.  Petitioner did not provide a deposit slip or bank                               
            statement, nor did he provide a cash receipts journal entry                                
            reflecting that the loan, if received, was included in gross                               
            receipts.                                                                                  






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011