- 3 - The stipulated facts and the accompanying exhibits are incorporated into our findings by this reference. At the time the petition in this case was filed, petitioner resided in San Leandro, California. Petitioner has a college degree in finance and was employed as a tax auditor by the State Board of Equalization of California during the year at issue. Petitioner claimed a dependency exemption deduction for two children--his son, Bradley, and daughter, Michelle. Bradley lived with petitioner until sometime in June, after which time he lived with his mother in Texas. After Bradley went to live with his mother, petitioner did not provide any financial support for the child. On his return, petitioner reported that he paid $5,760 for medical expenses and $4,800 for child care for his two children. Respondent disallowed these deductions for lack of substantiation of the amounts claimed and because petitioner did not establish that he had two dependent children. As a result of an investigation, petitioner was terminated from his job at the State Board of Equalization sometime during May of 1995. Upon termination, petitioner's briefcase was taken from him for a while, and he was not allowed back inside the building. After losing his position at the State Board ofPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011