Estate of Harry Orenstein - Page 12




                                       - 12 -                                         
          of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed but did so on the                 
          grounds that we lacked jurisdiction to apply the doctrine.  See             
          Estate of Mueller v. Commissioner, 153 F.3d at 307.                         
               In Estate of Branson v. Commissioner, supra at 10-11,                  
          however, we expressly considered the ruling by the Court of                 
          Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.  We declined then to alter our               
          stand on the issue of equitable recoupment for the reasons                  
          previously discussed and, believing these reasons still valid, we           
          likewise decline to do so now.  Thus, in accordance with the                
          position of this Court regarding our authority to grant equitable           
          recoupment relief, and with respondent’s concession that                    
          petitioners meet the requirements of the defense, petitioners               
          would be entitled to recoup the barred estate tax overpayment               
          against the stipulated income tax deficiencies.  We therefore               
          turn to whether, under the rule of Golsen v. Commissioner, 54               
          T.C. 742 (1970), the decision by the Court of Appeals for the               
          Fifth Circuit in Continental Equities, Inc. v. Commissioner, 551            
          F.2d 74 (5th Cir. 1977), demands a contrary result.                         
               C.  The Golsen Rule and the Eleventh Circuit                           
               In Golsen v. Commissioner, supra at 757, this Court                    
          established the rule that we shall “follow a Court of Appeals               
          decision which is squarely in point where appeal from our                   
          decision lies to that Court of Appeals” (the Golsen rule).  We              
          subsequently have further clarified the doctrine’s reach,                   






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011