Pamela Osowski - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         

               Burton Kanter is a tax attorney, and petitioner was his                
          executive secretary from March 1962 to June 1970.  Mr. Kanter               
          advised petitioner to participate in Degree, and she relied                 
          solely upon his advice in making her decision to do so.  Mr.                
          Kanter has no experience in the development, operation,                     
          marketing, or appraisal of energy management systems.                       
               Petitioner's participation in Degree was not motivated by a            
          desire for economic profit.  She participated in Degree solely              
          for tax reasons.                                                            
                                     Discussion                                       
               We review respondent’s determination that petitioner is                
          subject to sections 6621(c) and 6659.  Petitioner, as the                   
          taxpayer, bears the burden of disproving that determination.  See           
          Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).  In              
          order to meet her burden of proof, petitioner must introduce                
          sufficient evidence to:  (1) Make a prima facie case establishing           
          that respondent committed the errors alleged in the petition and            
          (2) overcome the evidence submitted by (or otherwise favorable              
          to) respondent.  See Lyon v. Commissioner, 1 B.T.A. 378, 379                
          (1925).  The fact that the case was submitted to the Court fully            
          stipulated under Rule 122 does not change or otherwise lessen               
          petitioner’s burden.  See Borchers v. Commissioner, 95 T.C. 82,             
          91 (1990), affd. on other issues 943 F.2d 22 (8th Cir. 1991).               







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011