Miguel Martin and Claudia P. Palos - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          Military property.  About 4 days after the Northridge earthquake,           
          petitioners rented the Military property.                                   
               Petitioners filed a claim with their property insurance                
          carrier with respect to the earthquake.  The insurance adjuster             
          estimated that the repair necessary to address the earthquake               
          damage was $9,221, an amount that was less than petitioners’                
          $9,530 policy deductible for earthquake damage.  Petitioners                
          consulted with a real estate company, seeking an opinion as to              
          the decrease in fair market value, if any, due to the earthquake.           
          The real estate company opined that the Military property lost              
          approximately $30,000 in value due to the earthquake.  The                  
          reduction in value was attributable to the actual damage and also           
          to the safety issues that may be perceived by potential buyers of           
          damaged older homes in areas prone to earthquake damage.                    
               On their 1994 joint income tax return, petitioners, on                 
          advice of their return preparer, claimed a $25,000 business                 
          casualty loss on the premise that the Military property was held            
          for business or other income-producing purposes; i.e., for rental           
          or sale at the time of the earthquake.  Respondent determined               
          that petitioners were not entitled to a casualty loss.                      













Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011