Jacob and Chana Pinson, et al. - Page 15




                                       - 15 -                                         
          marketing commission.”  The financial statements do not show                
          dividends as having been paid to shareholders.  The Israeli tax             
          returns reflect a deduction for these expenses and likewise do              
          not show any amount as having been paid as a dividend to                    
          shareholders.  No taxes were withheld or remitted to the State of           
          Israel on the payments to DPC and DPP.                                      
          The Special Commissions                                                     
               Commencing in 1987, FIL also began making payments by wire             
          transfer directly to accounts in the name of “Flocktex                      
          shareholders”.  For the years at issue, the recipients and                  
          amounts of these payments are set forth below:                              

                            1991         1992         1993         1994               
          David Deitsch    $875,000   $2,350,000       $0       $1,000,000            
          Mordecai              0            0         0               0              
          Deitsch                                                                     
          Joseph Deitsch    875,000    2,350,000       0         1,000,000            
          Rachel Sandman    875,000    2,350,000       0         1,000,000            
          B. Mayer Zeiler       0            0         0               0              
          Jacob Pinson      875,000    2,350,000       0         1,000,000            
          Through withholding, income taxes were paid by the recipients to            
          the State of Israel on the amounts shown above.  Letters issued             
          by Israeli authorities certifying receipt of the income taxes               
          specify that the sums were due in respect of “commission fees”              
          from FIL.                                                                   
               On its financial statements, FIL again classified these                
          payments as “selling expenses” and included the following                   
          explanation:  “In accordance with an agreement with the Company’s           




Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011