Quantum Company Trust - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
          Quantum Co. Trust, Lonnie D. Crockett, Trustee, docket No. 185-98:          
                                                  Accuracy-Related Penalty            
               Year           Deficiency          Sec. 6662(a)                        
               1993           $10,124                  $2,025                         
          David C. and Lois K. Norton, a.k.a. Kim Z. Norton, docket No. 186-          
          98:                                                                         
                                                  Accuracy-Related Penalty            
               Year           Deficiency          Sec. 6662(a)                        
               1993           $123,751                 $24,750                        
               The parties now agree that the income reported by Quantum Co.          
          Trust for 1993 ($28,000) is properly reportable on the Schedule C,          
          Profit or Loss From Business, of the 1993 Federal income tax return         
          of David C. and Lois K. Norton (the Nortons).  Consequently,                
          respondent concedes that no deficiency or penalty exists with               
          respect to Quantum Co. Trust for 1993.  Further, the parties                
          resolved many of their differences giving rise to the deficiency            
          respondent determined against the Nortons.  After giving effect to          
          concessions by each of the parties, the issues remaining for                
          decision are:  (1) With respect to calculating the profit from              
          David C. Norton’s (Mr. Norton’s) construction activities conducted          
          through his sole proprietorship known as Northridge Construction            
          (Northridge) in 1993, (a) whether Northridge’s gross receipts were          
          underreported by $86,155, (b) whether Northridge’s 1993 cost of             
          goods sold is greater than the amount stipulated by the parties,            
          and (c) whether the Nortons are entitled to a deduction for travel          
          expenses in an amount greater than allowed by respondent; (2)               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011