Hubert R. G. Raney - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
          returns.  Petitioner has not filed any other income tax returns             
          for the years in issue.                                                     
               In correspondence with respondent, petitioner indicated that           
          he did not believe that the tax laws required him to pay tax on             
          the income that he received.  Petitioner continues to take that             
          position in his brief.                                                      
                                       OPINION                                        
               Petitioner received wage income from the U.S. Postal Service           
          during each of the years 1994, 1995, and 1996 in the respective             
          amounts of $34,490, $35,261, and $35,428.  Petitioner also                  
          received pension income during 1994, 1995, and 1996 in the                  
          respective amounts of $6,258, $6,420, and $6,591.2  Petitioner              
          generally argues that no act of Congress authorizes taxation of             
          these amounts.  We disagree.  All these amounts constitute gross            
          income under section 61.  Petitioner’s arguments to the contrary            
          are wholly without merit and not worthy of further analysis.  We            
          hold that petitioner has deficiencies in income taxes in the                
          amounts determined in the notice of deficiency.                             
               Respondent also determined that petitioner is liable for               
          additions to tax pursuant to section 6651(f) for fraudulent                 
          failure to file returns for each of the years in issue.  The                

               2In computing the amount of the deficiencies, respondent               
          determined that petitioner was liable for an increase in tax of             
          10 percent on the pension distributions pursuant to sec. 72(t).             
          Petitioner has not disputed this and offered no evidence on this            
          point.                                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011