Arnold Reisman and Ellen Reisman - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
          loss of consortium.  To the extent CWRU’s payment was in exchange           
          for Mr. Reisman’s tenure, the settlement proceeds would not be              
          excludable from gross income under section 104(a)(2).  See                  
          Kurowski v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1989-149, affd. 917 F.2d               
          1033 (7th Cir. 1990).  To the extent any of CWRU’s payment was              
          for breach of contract, the settlement proceeds would not be                
          excludable from gross income under section 104(a)(2).  See                  
          Robinson v. Commissioner, 102 T.C. 116, 126 (1994), affd. in part           
          and revd. in part on another issue 70 F.3d 34 (5th Cir. 1995).              
          Finally, to the extent any of CWRU’s payment was for punitive               
          damages, then the proceeds would not be excludable from gross               
          income under section 104(a)(2).  See O’Gilvie v. United States,             
          519 U.S. 79, 90 (1996).                                                     
               In short, the nature of most of petitioners’ claims that               
          were resolved as part of the settlement agreement are nontort               
          type and would not be excluded from gross income under section              
          104(a)(2).                                                                  
               Some of petitioners’ common law claims are tort type claims.           
          Petitioners argue that, as a result of res judicata, the only               
          claims outstanding at the time of the settlement were personal              
          injury tort claims.  We disagree.                                           
               The settlement agreement provides that petitioners are being           
          compensated for the compromise of disputed claims and for Mr.               
          Reisman’s resignation and relinquishment of his tenure rights.              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011