- 17 - this claim might be inflated, the record establishes that Renier was open 68 hours per week. We do not believe that Kent’s sales and management functions could be duplicated with a 40-hour work week at $19.23 per hour, plus 20 percent in fringe benefits (or total annual compensation of approximately $48,000), as Mr. Sliwoski’s postulates. If one considers only Kent’s sales function, his annual compensation would exceed $40,000,10 before considering his multiple management and administrative duties. In addition, Mr. Sliwoski failed to consider that except for the last approximately 7 months of the base period, decedent also actively assisted in Renier’s operation. We therefore do not believe Mr. Sliwoski’s computations of reasonable compensation for the sales and management functions performed by related parties are reliable. On this record, we have no alternative but to substitute our best judgment of the value of the sales and management services that were performed by Kent as of the valuation date (and various other family members during the base period). Taking into account the hours claimed in Kent’s testimony, it is our judgment that the sales and management functions performed by him could be accomplished in a 60-hour work week. Using Mr. Sliwoski’s 10 Respondent conceded that Kent was responsible for approximately one-third of Renier’s annual sales of $1.5 million. If Kent received a commission of 6 to 8 percent on those sales, a commission which Mr. Sliwoski himself conceded was reasonable in the business, plus benefits equal to 20 percent of this amount, his compensation as a salesman would have exceeded $40,000.Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011