- 14 - incurred by Research II in connection with its trade or business. In Snow v. Commissioner, 416 U.S. 500, 502 (1974), the Supreme Court compared the "in connection" language of section 174 with the "in carrying on" language of section 1624 and established that a business need not currently produce or sell any product in order to obtain a deduction for research or experimental expenditures. Rather, the Supreme Court reasoned that the policy behind section 174, which is to aid "small or pioneering business enterprises" as well as more established ones, calls for a more relaxed "trade or business requirement" than applies to section 162. Id. at 503-504. In Green v. Commissioner, 83 T.C. 667, 671-672 (1984), a deduction pursuant to section 174 was claimed by a partnership that entered into a research and development agreement with a research corporation and on the same day, through the grant of an exclusive license, divested itself of all ownership rights to the inventions to be produced. We held that Snow "did not eliminate the 'trade or business' requirement of section 174 altogether" and denied the partnership the deduction. Id. at 4 Sec. 162(a) provides: SEC. 174(a). In General.--There shall be allowed as a deduction all the ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business, * * *.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011