- 17 - Petitioners contend that Cabana Boy borrowed $2.2 million from Crossland Mortgage Corp. We disagree. That loan was to petitioners. Petitioners point out that Cabana Boy borrowed $50,000 from Harris. However, the terms of that loan differ from the terms of the advances because Cabana Boy had three coborrowers and Harris wanted to be paid a high interest rate and also receive a percentage of the profits from the movie. This factor favors respondent. 9. Use of Funds Using cash advances to finance initial business operations such as daily operating expenses may suggest that the advances were equity. See Slappey Drive Ind. Park v. United States, supra at 583; Plantation Patterns, Inc. v. Commissioner, 462 F.2d 712, 722 (5th Cir. 1972). Cabana Boy used $100,000 of the advances to acquire the rights to Neuromancer. Cabana Boy used the remainder of the funds at issue to pay for all of its operations including daily expenses. This factor favors respondent. 10. Source of Repayments Advances are more likely to be equity if the only source of funds for repayment is corporate earnings. See Electronic Modules Corp. v. United States, supra at 1372; Estate of Mixon v. United States, supra at 405. Petitioners contend that Cabana Boy did not need corporate earnings to repay the advances because itPage: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011