Kenneth G. Schladweiler - Page 16




                                       - 16 -                                         
          to run his steam cleaner, welder, and air compressor and to                 
          charge his trucks in the winter.  Petitioner used their phone for           
          long-distance business calls.  Petitioner documented that he paid           
          $846 of his parents’ phone bills and $591 of his parents’ utility           
          bills.                                                                      
               In the notice of deficiency, respondent allowed petitioner             
          some deductions for utilities.  Respondent calculated the                   
          allowance for telephone costs by subtracting from the phone                 
          expenses paid the estimated annual cost of basic residential                
          coverage ($110) and then allowing petitioner a deduction equal to           
          75 percent of the balance expended by petitioner.  Respondent               
          calculated the allowance for electricity and water by allowing              
          petitioner a deduction equal to 75 percent of the balance                   
          expended by petitioner.5                                                    
               Under the circumstances, the amount allowed by respondent              
          for utilities is reasonable.  Petitioner did not keep precise               
          records of the utilities used by his business.  In fact, because            
          of the loose reimbursement arrangement petitioner had with his              




               5On brief, respondent states that he determined the amount             
          to be disallowed as follows:  Of the $2,755 of documentation                
          submitted, $1,318 reflected expenses paid by petitioner’s                   
          parents, $110 was the cost of basic phone coverage, and $332 was            
          treated as allocable to personal use.  The adjustment was                   
          determined by subtracting from the amount claimed on petitioner’s           
          1994 return, $1,429, the amount respondent calculated was                   
          allowed, $995, resulting in an adjustment of $434, rounded.                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011