114 T.C. No. 37 UNITED STATES TAX COURT STEVEN AND DAVINA SEGO, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 12313-99L. Filed June 30, 2000. Ps commenced a proceeding in response to two Notices of Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) Under Section 6320 and/or 6330. P husband had received a notice of deficiency but returned it to the IRS with frivolous language written on it; he did not file a petition in response to the notice of deficiency. Attempts to deliver the notice of deficiency to P wife were made at Ps’ residence, but the notice was returned unclaimed. Ps seek in this action to challenge the underlying merits of respondent’s determination in the statutory notices of deficiency rather than challenging the appropriateness of the intended method of collection, offering an alternative means of collection, or raising spousal defenses to collection. Held, there was no abuse of discretion by respondent in allowing collection to proceed.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011