J. Michael Shedd and Marita Shedd - Page 15




                                       - 15 -                                         
          shareholders even though no funds or property are directly                  
          received by them.                                                           
               Two tests are normally employed to decide whether a transfer           
          between related corporations constitutes a constructive dividend.           
          One is an objective distribution test and the other a subjective            
          test of primary purpose, both of which must be satisfied.  See              
          Stinnett's Pontiac Serv., Inc. v. Commissioner, supra at 641.               
               First, there must be a distribution from the transferring              
          corporation's earnings and profits; i.e., the transferee                    
          corporation must receive something at the expense of the                    
          transferor.  This test requires property to leave the control of            
          the transferor corporation in a way that allows a common                    
          shareholder to directly or indirectly control the property                  
          through some other instrumentality.  Where property is                      
          transferred between related corporations, a common shareholder              
          does not personally receive the property.  Therefore, a                     
          distribution is thought to occur when a transferee corporation              
          attains an increase in assets or control at the expense of a                
          transferor corporation.  The amount of such distribution is                 
          measured by the loss to the transferring corporation.  See                  
          Sammons v. Commissioner, 472 F.2d 449, 451, 453 (5th Cir. 1972),            
          affg. in part, revg. in part and remanding on other grounds T.C.            
          Memo. 1971-145; Stinnett's Pontiac Serv., Inc. v. Commissioner,             








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011