Cathleen C. Shepherd - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
               The settlement agreement further provided that petitioner              
          would have custody of the children and receive monthly “child               
          support for the benefit of the minor children” in the amount of             
          $650 per child from Mr. Shepherd with annual increases                      
          commensurate with increases in the consumer price index.  Under             
          the terms of the agreement, child support payments were to                  
          continue for each child as long as petitioner had custody of that           
          minor child or until the child died, married, or reached the age            
          of 18, whichever occurred first.  In addition, if the alimony               
          payments were to cease due to petitioner’s remarriage or because            
          she engaged in a meretricious relationship, the child support               
          payments would immediately increase to $1,200 per month per                 
          child.                                                                      
               Petitioner filed U.S. individual income tax returns for                
          1993, 1994, and 1995, and treated the $28,800 in “alimony”                  
          received each year from Mr. Shepherd under the terms of the                 
          settlement agreement as nontaxable child support.  Respondent               
          maintains that the payments were in fact alimony and thus should            
          be included in petitioner’s taxable income.                                 
                                     Discussion                                       
               Alimony is taxable to the recipient and is deductible by the           
          payor.  See secs. 71(a), 215(a).  Child support payments, on the            
          other hand, are neither includable in income under section 71 nor           








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011