Anthony Tinsman - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
               Petitioner relies on United States v. Janis, supra, and                
          Portillo v. Commissioner, 932 F.2d 1128, 1133 (5th Cir. 1991),              
          revg. in part, affg. in part and remanding T.C. Memo. 1990-68, as           
          support for his position that the notice of deficiency in this              
          case is arbitrary and excessive and therefore not entitled to the           
          normal presumption of correctness.  In Janis, the Supreme Court             
          held that a "'naked' assessment without any foundation                      
          whatsoever" may be excessive and without rational foundation.4              
          United States v. Janis, supra at 441.  In Portillo, the taxpayer            
          was issued a deficiency notice determining that he had received             
          unreported income due to a discrepancy between the amount he had            
          reported and the amount on a Form 1099 filed by his employer.               
          The employer could account for only part of the discrepancy and             
          had no records for the remainder.  Because the taxpayer disputed            
          that he was paid the income, the Court of Apppeals for Fifth                
          Circuit found that the Commissioner had failed to substantiate              
          the deficiency by any other means, the Court of Appeals concluded           
          that the deficiency was excessive and arbitrary.                            
               In a later case, the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit            
          explained that its holding in Portillo does not require "an                 


               4  Although the issue of a "naked assessment" generally                
          arises when an illegal tax-generating activity is alleged, the              
          Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit seems to have extended              
          the principle to legal tax-generating activity as well.  See Day            
          v. Commissioner, 975 F.2d 534, 537 (8th Cir. 1992), affg. in                
          part, revg. in part and remanding on another issue T.C. Memo.               
          1991-140.                                                                   




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011