- 3 - Background The parties have filed with the Court a stipulation of facts and exhibits attached thereto. We find the stipulated facts accordingly, and we set forth the relevant facts in this background section. We also set forth in this section facts which we find from the exhibits and from matters which petitioners admitted under Rule 90. Petitioners resided in Brooklyn, New York, when they filed their petition with the Court. Petitioner Robert W. Toan is a tax attorney who received a law degree in 1968 and an LL.M. in taxation in 1977, both from New York University School of Law. Petitioners filed a joint 1982 Federal income tax return on which they claimed an investment tax credit arising from Catamount. Catamount was organized in 1982 to purchase energy management systems equipment for installation in certain identified locations. Petitioners invested in Catamount in 1982, and they had a .470589-percent interest in its profits and losses during that year. Catamount placed energy management systems equipment in service during 1982. It claimed on its 1982 Federal partnership information return that its tax basis in that equipment was $13,100,000 and that the entire basis qualified for the investment tax credit. Catamount’s claimed tax basis was based on its position that the fair market value of the equipment wasPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011