- 6 - alternatives, which may include the posting of a bond, the substitution of other assets, an installment agreement, or an offer-in- compromise. (B) Underlying liability.–-The person may also raise at the hearing challenges to the existence or amount of the underlying tax liability for any tax period if the person did not receive any statutory notice of deficiency for such tax liability or did not otherwise have an opportunity to dispute such tax liability. Pursuant to section 6330(d)(1), within 30 days of the issuance of the notice of determination, the taxpayer may appeal that determination to this Court if we have jurisdiction over the underlying tax liability. If we do not have jurisdiction over the underlying tax liability, then the appeal is to be made to a U.S. District Court. See sec. 6330(d)(1). Respondent interprets the petition as seeking review of the section 6702 frivolous return penalties and not the “unpaid income tax assessment.” Petitioner does not object to that interpretation of the petition. After reviewing the petition and the record, we conclude that petitioner seeks review of all of respondent’s collection activities with regard to the section 6702 frivolous return penalties assessed, including related interest. We view the references to “$1,000" and “two frivolous tax return penalties” in the petition as petitioner’s attempt to contest respondent’s prior collection activities which were notPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011