Henry Hermanus Van Es - Page 6




                                        - 6 -                                         
                         alternatives, which may include the                          
                         posting of a bond, the substitution                          
                         of other assets, an installment                              
                         agreement, or an offer-in-                                   
                         compromise.                                                  
                         (B) Underlying liability.–-The person                        
                    may also raise at the hearing challenges to                       
                    the existence or amount of the underlying tax                     
                    liability for any tax period if the person                        
                    did not receive any statutory notice of                           
                    deficiency for such tax liability or did not                      
                    otherwise have an opportunity to dispute such                     
                    tax liability.                                                    
          Pursuant to section 6330(d)(1), within 30 days of the issuance of           
          the notice of determination, the taxpayer may appeal that                   
          determination to this Court if we have jurisdiction over the                
          underlying tax liability.  If we do not have jurisdiction over              
          the underlying tax liability, then the appeal is to be made to a            
          U.S. District Court.  See sec. 6330(d)(1).                                  
               Respondent interprets the petition as seeking review of the            
          section 6702 frivolous return penalties and not the “unpaid                 
          income tax assessment.”  Petitioner does not object to that                 
          interpretation of the petition.  After reviewing the petition and           
          the record, we conclude that petitioner seeks review of all of              
          respondent’s collection activities with regard to the section               
          6702 frivolous return penalties assessed, including related                 
          interest.                                                                   
               We view the references to “$1,000" and “two frivolous tax              
          return penalties” in the petition as petitioner’s attempt to                
          contest respondent’s prior collection activities which were not             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011