Van Roekel Farms, Inc. - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          Background                                                                  
               Petitioner, an Iowa corporation since 1977 with its                    
          principal place of business in Orange City, Iowa, engages in                
          farming operations.  It uses the cash method of accounting with a           
          fiscal year ending July 31 to compute its income.  Effective                
          August 1, 1990, petitioner adopted the ESOP (a defined                      
          contribution plan) and a trust to hold and invest the ESOP’s                
          assets.  The plan used a July 31 fiscal year end as its annual              
          accounting period.  Before fiscal 1996, petitioner never                    
          requested a determination letter from the Internal Revenue                  
          Service regarding the ESOP’s status.3                                       
               Petitioner’s founder and president was Eugene Van Roekel.              
          He was also the only trustee and participant of the plan.                   
          Petitioner twice purported to amend the ESOP--on December 29,               
          1994,4 effective for plan years beginning August 1, 1994, and               
          again on August 26, 1997.                                                   
               Under the plan, petitioner’s board of directors had sole               
          discretion to decide the amount, if any, that petitioner would              
          contribute each year from its profits, except in cases where                
          payments became due on an ESOP loan.  Moreover, petitioner was              

               3The record is unclear as to whether petitioner has since              
          requested a determination letter from the Internal Revenue                  
          Service.                                                                    
               4Although the written amendment dated Dec. 29, 1994, is                
          unsigned, we do not address its validity, because the amendments            
          made therein do not affect the outcome of this case.                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011