Richard D. Warren and Elizabeth K. - Page 14




                                       - 14 -                                         
          section 107 exclusion, than a minister without additional income.           
          We are aware of no authority to justify our consideration of this           
          point in construing section 107(2).6                                        
          E.   Conclusion                                                             
               For the foregoing reasons, we hold that the exclusion from             
          gross income for a designated parsonage allowance is not limited            
          to the lesser of the fair market rental value of the home or the            
          amount used to provide a home.                                              
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                                  Decision will be entered            
                                             under Rule 155.                          


               Reviewed by the Court.                                                 


               CHABOT, PARR, WELLS, WHALEN, HALPERN, BEGHE, CHIECHI, LARO,            
          FOLEY, VASQUEZ, GALE, THORNTON, and MARVEL, JJ., agree with this            
          majority opinion.                                                           






               6  The dissent asserts that the majority is sanctioning                
          abuse and that this case is an archetypical example of abuse.               
          We recognize that the fact that petitioner has income from a                
          Schedule C activity enables him to spend more for housing.  The             
          same financial flexibility would be available to a minister who             
          has investment income or who is married to a spouse that earns a            
          separate income.  Despite the dissent’s concerns, there are no              
          special limits in sec. 107(2) providing for those situations.               
          Concern over those issues does not, contrary to the urging of the           
          dissent, justify our adding a fair rental value limit to sec.               
          107(2).                                                                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011