Keith E. and Marilyn B. West - Page 33




                                       - 33 -                                         
          economic substance.  Similarly, the records in these cases                  
          plainly show that the overvaluation of the recyclers is integral            
          to and is the core of our holding that Masters was a sham and               
          lacked economic substance.                                                  
               Petitioners’ reliance on McCrary v. Commissioner, supra, is            
          misplaced.  In that case, the taxpayers conceded entitlement to             
          their claimed tax benefits, and the section 6659 addition to tax            
          was held inapplicable.  However, the taxpayers’ concession of the           
          claimed tax benefits, in and of itself, did not preclude                    
          imposition of the section 6659 addition to tax.  In McCrary v.              
          Commissioner, supra, the section 6659 addition to tax was                   
          disallowed because the agreement at issue was conceded to be a              
          license and not a lease.  In contrast, the records in                       
          petitioners’ cases plainly show that petitioners’ underpayments             
          were attributable to overvaluation of the recyclers.                        
          Accordingly, petitioners’ reliance on McCrary v. Commissioner,              
          supra, is inappropriate.5                                                   
               We held in Provizer v. Commissioner, supra, that each                  
          recycler had a fair market value not in excess of $50,000.  Our             



          5    Petitioners’ citation of Heasley v. Commissioner, supra, in            
          support of the concession argument is also inappropriate.  The              
          Heasley case was not decided by the Court of Appeals for the                
          Fifth Circuit on the basis of a concession.  Moreover, see supra            
          note 4 to the effect that the Court of Appeals for the Eighth               
          Circuit and this Court have not followed the Court of Appeals for           
          the Fifth Circuit’s rationale with respect to the application of            
          sec. 6659.                                                                  





Page:  Previous  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011