Stephen W. Williams - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          Discussion                                                                  
          I.  Deficiency Liability                                                    
               Petitioner does not challenge either the facts on which                
          respondent’s determination is based or respondent’s calculation             
          of tax.  In fact, respondent based the computation of the                   
          deficiency on the amounts reported by petitioner on the altered             
          1040 and the disclaimer 1040.  Petitioner, nevertheless, contends           
          he is not liable for the deficiency.  Petitioner claims that (1)            
          he did not volunteer to self-assess or pay his taxes, and he                
          therefore cannot be held liable for any deficiency; (2) his                 
          income is not from any of the sources listed in section 1.861-              
          8(a), Income Tax Regs., and thus is not taxable; and (3) the                
          notice of deficiency was improperly issued because petitioner               
          disclaimed the tax liability shown on the return.                           
               Petitioner’s arguments are reminiscent of tax-protester                
          rhetoric that has been universally rejected by this and other               
          courts.  We shall not painstakingly address petitioner’s                    
          assertions “with somber reasoning and copious citation of                   
          precedent; to do so might suggest that these arguments have some            
          colorable merit.”  Crain v. Commissioner, 737 F.2d 1417, 1417               
          (5th Cir. 1984).  Accordingly, we conclude that petitioner is               
          liable for the deficiency determined by respondent.                         
          II.  Accuracy-related Penalty                                               
               Respondent determined that petitioner is liable for an                 
          accuracy-related penalty pursuant to section 6662(a) for his                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011