Estate of Rebecca A. Wineman - Page 24




                                       - 24 -                                         

          dispute that the below-market rent is a taxable gift under                  
          section 2503, respondent is sustained on this issue.10                      
          III. Fair Market Value of Decedent's Real Estate                            
               A.   Introduction                                                      
               The penultimate issue in this case is the determination of             
          the fair market value of decedent's interest in the Nipomo                  
          properties.  The positions of the parties and our conclusions               
          with respect to the properties in dispute are as follows:                   
                           Petitioner's     Respondent's                             
          Parcel         Form 706   Expert    Notice1   Expert    Court               
          5 - El Suey    $485,000  $485,000  $732,105  $819,000  $580,153             
          6 - Nipomo     205,000   205,000   302,315   331,000   247,860              
          9 - Lot 74     65,000    65,000    76,500    108,000   81,000               
          10 - The Pit   nominal   150       34,950    8,000     1,750                
               1Statutory Notice of Deficiency.                                       
          Our analysis is set forth below.                                            
               Fair market value is “the price at which the property would            
          change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller,                  
          neither being under any compulsion to buy or to sell and both               
          having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts.”  United States v.           
          Cartwright, 411 U.S. 546, 551 (1973); sec. 20.2031-1(b), Estate             
          Tax Regs.  The willing buyer and the willing seller are purely              



               10A computational adjustment will be required to give effect           
          to the parties’ stipulation regarding decedent’s cash gifts.  The           
          parties stipulated that decedent gave $10,000 in cash to each               
          child in 1989, although the taxable gifts adjustment in the                 
          notice of deficiency was based on a determination that decedent             
          made an $8,000 gift to each child in that year.  The stipulated             
          figure is given binding effect.  See Rule 91(e).                            





Page:  Previous  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011