Edward K. & Susie Y. Wong - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          or interview during the 90-day period does not suspend the period           
          for filing a petition with Tax Court in Washington, D.C.  The               
          last day for filing a petition is 9/13/98".  Respondent concedes,           
          and we hold, that the 90-day period for timely filing a petition            
          with respect to this notice of deficiency expired on Monday,                
          September 14, 1998, because September 13, 1998, the 90th day,               
          fell on a Sunday.                                                           
               On January 12, 1999, respondent mailed petitioner a letter             
          that stated:                                                                
               Enclosed are two copies of a report supplementing the                  
               statutory notice of deficiency we sent you earlier.  This              
               report explains changes we made to our proposed adjustments.           
               * * *                                                                  
                    If you do not accept, you may, within the period stated           
               in the statutory notice, petition the United States Tax                
               Court for a redetermination of your tax liability.                     
                    This correspondence and consideration of your case has            
               not extended the period in which you may file a petition               
               with the United States Tax Court.  If no petition is filed             
               within the allotted time, we will assess the tax and bill              
               you.                                                                   
               Attached to the letter was an examination report which                 
          showed that certain deductions were allowed, resulting in a                 
          reduced deficiency of $8,606.                                               
               On behalf of petitioners, their accountant wrote respondent            
          a letter dated January 19, 1999, which stated that the newly                
          determined amount of the deficiency had the legal effect of                 
          withdrawing the notice of deficiency.  Respondent did not reply             
          to this letter.  Petitioners filed their petition based on the              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011