Ella Louise Wooten - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         

          the principal place of abode for more than one-half of the                  
          taxable year of a son or daughter of the taxpayer who resides               
          there as a member of that household.  An individual taxpayer is             
          considered as maintaining a household only if he or she furnishes           
          more than one-half of the cost of maintaining that household.               
          See sec. 2(b).                                                              
               Section 32(a) provides for an earned income credit in the              
          case of an eligible individual.  Section 32(c)(1)(A), in                    
          pertinent part, defines an "eligible individual" as an individual           
          who has a qualifying child for the taxable year.2  Sec.                     
          32(c)(1)(A)(i).  A qualifying child is one who satisfies a                  
          relationship test, a residency test, an age test, and an                    
          identification requirement.  See sec. 32(c)(3).  To satisfy the             
          residency test, the qualifying child must have the same principal           
          place of abode as the taxpayer for more than one-half of the                
          taxable year in which the credit is claimed.  See sec.                      
          32(c)(3)(A)(ii).                                                            


               2    Although petitioner may be considered an eligible                 
          individual without a qualifying child pursuant to sec.                      
          32(c)(1)(A)(ii), petitioner is not entitled to an earned income             
          credit for 1995 and 1996 because her adjusted gross income for              
          those years exceeds the sec. 32(a) limitation for such eligible             
          individuals.  However, petitioner's 1997 adjusted gross income              
          did not exceed the sec. 32(a)(2) limitation for such eligible               
          individuals.  Accordingly, respondent allowed petitioner the                
          earned income credit for 1997 as an eligible individual without a           
          qualifying child.  However, petitioner's claim to the earned                
          income credit was based on her having two qualifying children.              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011