- 5 - paid by petitioner's brother, with help from the Government. Without proper substantiation, the Court cannot conclude from the record that more than one-half of the support of each claimed dependent was provided by petitioner. Thus, petitioner has failed to establish that he provided over half of the total support for Melissa and Omar. Accordingly, we hold that petitioner is not entitled to claim his niece and nephew as dependents under section 151. Respondent determined that petitioner's filing status should be changed from head of household to single. Section 2(b), in relevant part, defines head of household as an unmarried taxpayer who maintains as his home a household which constitutes for more than one-half of such taxable year the principal place of abode of a person who is a dependent of the taxpayer, if the taxpayer is entitled to a deduction for the taxable year for such person under section 151. Sec. 2(b)(1)(A)(ii). Because we held that petitioner is not entitled to a deduction for either his niece or his nephew in 1998 under section 151, we also hold that petitioner may not claim head of household filing status. We sustain respondent's determination as to this issue. Petitioner claimed a credit for child and dependent care expenses of $566 for 1998, which respondent disallowed. Section 21 provides, in part, that an individual who maintains a household which includes as a member a qualifying individualPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011