John Awadallah and Susan Malaty - Page 10




                                        - 9 -                                         
          actually paid, are personal expenses and not deductible trade and           
          business expenses under section 162.                                        
               In reaching our holdings herein, we have considered all                
          arguments made, and to the extent not mentioned above, we                   
          conclude they are moot, irrelevant, or without merit.2                      
               Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case               
          Division.                                                                   
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                                  Decision will be entered            
                                             for respondent as to                     
                                             petitioner John Awadallah, and           
                                             an order of dismissal and                
                                             decision will be entered as to           
                                             petitioner Susan Malaty.                 














               2    Petitioner contends that the burden of proof should               
          rest with respondent pursuant to sec. 7491(a).  Petitioner failed           
          to comply with the requirements of sec. 7491(a)(2), such as                 
          maintaining records.  Therefore, the burden of proof remains with           
          petitioner.  See Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. __ (2001).                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  

Last modified: May 25, 2011