- 6 - OPINION We agree with petitioner that he should not have claimed a $694 overpayment on his 1997 return but rather should have reported a balance due of $15. However, we decide issues by judging what actually happened and not by what should have happened. See Commissioner v. National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co., 417 U.S. 134, 148-149 (1974). The undisputed facts in this case demonstrate that petitioner claimed a $694 overpayment on his 1997 return and that respondent credited the overpayment against an outstanding income tax liability owed by petitioner for 1988. We reject petitioner’s contention that respondent should not have credited the 1997 overpayment against the 1988 liability. Respondent’s action was taken pursuant to statutory authority conferred by section 6402(a).5 That section provides in relevant part as follows: (a)General Rule.--In the case of any overpayment, the Secretary * * * may credit the amount of such overpayment * * * against any liability in respect of any internal revenue tax on the part of the person who made the overpayment * * * . At the time that petitioner filed his 1997 return and claimed an overpayment, he owed tax for 1988. At the time that respondent credited the claimed overpayment against the outstanding liability, no contractual or other limitation 5 All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 1997, the taxable year in issue.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011