Paul A. Bilzerian - Page 15




                                       - 15 -                                         
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-153; Garrett v. Commissioner, T.C.            
          Memo. 1997-231.                                                             
               Assuming arguendo that all necessary information was                   
          provided to Mr. Norris before his preparation of petitioner’s               
          1986 return, we still would not deviate from the general rule               
          that the duty of filing accurate returns cannot be avoided by               
          placing responsibility on an agent.  Even if all necessary                  
          information is supplied to the return preparer, the taxpayer                
          still has a duty to review the return prior to signing and filing           
          it in order to ensure that all income items are included.  Metra            
          Chem Corp. v. Commissioner, 88 T.C. at 662; Magill v.                       
          Commissioner, 70 T.C. 465, 479-480 (1978), affd. 651 F.2d 1233              
          (6th Cir. 1981); Bailey v. Commissioner, 21 T.C. 678, 687 (1954);           
          Magee v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-305; Fraley v.                       
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-304.11                                        
               Petitioner claims that he carefully reviewed the return and            
          that there was no way he could have recognized that approximately           



               11See Loftus v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-266 n.3,                 
          wherein we stated:                                                          
               The responsibility to review a return cannot be                        
               trivialized.  In Morrow v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.                    
               1991-101, we held that supplying records to an                         
               accountant and relying on the accountant to prepare a                  
               return was not sufficient to relieve a taxpayer of the                 
               ‘ultimate responsibility for the correctness of their                  
               returns.’  Based on the taxpayers’ failure to                          
               adequately review their returns, we sustained the                      
               Commissioner’s negligence determination.                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011