- 4 - On August 10, 1999, respondent issued petitioner a statutory notice of deficiency for 1995 with the determination that petitioner had unreported capital gain of $125,000.1 The notice of deficiency stated that petitioner had elected out of the installment method and did not qualify for the claimed exclusion. Petitioner concedes that she did not live in the residence for the 3 years as she claimed on her return and is therefore not entitled to the exclusion. She argues that respondent’s determination is in error because her election out of the installment method was invalid. As a general rule, taxpayers are required to use the “installment method” with respect to any income from an “installment sale”. Sec. 453(a). The installment method is a method under which income is recognized in the year or years in which payments are received. Sec. 453(c). An installment sale generally is any sale in which at least one payment is to be received after the close of the taxable year of the sale. Sec. 453(b)(1). Taxpayers may elect out of the otherwise mandatory installment method. Sec. 453(d)(1). Subject to exceptions not applicable here, such an election must be made on or before the due date (including extensions) for filing the taxpayer’s return 1All other adjustments in the notice of deficiency are computational and will be resolved by the Court’s holding on the issue in this case.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011