Alan G. Bone and Kathleen A. Bone - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          A.J. Concrete Services and the Four Affiliates                              
               Alan Bone (Mr. Bone) and Jeffrey Guerrero (Mr. Guerrero)               
          owned 49 percent and 51 percent, respectively, of AJCS, an S                
          corporation incorporated in 1987 and engaged in the business of             
          supplying construction forming equipment and materials to various           
          contractors.4  AJCS, a calendar year taxpayer, maintained its               
          books on the percentage of completion method for financial                  
          accounting purposes and the completed contract method for tax               
          purposes.                                                                   
               As of December 31, 1992, AJCS owned ongoing construction               
          contracts with a total value of $19,975,949 and estimated                   
          projected gross profits of $8,763,221.  AJCS’ schedule of                   
          contracts reflects that, as of December 31, 1992, it had                    
          $2,680,500 of recognized gross profit on its partially completed            
          contracts.                                                                  
               On January 1, 1993, AJCS transferred its incomplete                    
          contracts to four C corporations:  A.J. Concrete Forming of                 
          Georgia, Inc. (Georgia); A.J. Concrete Forming Central, Inc.                




               4 Petitioners object to this finding of fact and contend               
          that AJCS “utilized its own construction forming forms, not                 
          equipment, in the business of concrete forming services.”  Our              
          finding, however, was agreed to and stipulated by the parties.  A           
          party is not permitted to contradict a stipulation in whole or in           
          part, except in the interest of justice.  See Rule 91(e); Stamos            
          v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 1451, 1454 (1986).  We do not find any             
          injustice to petitioners here and hold the parties to their                 
          stipulation.                                                                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011