- 7 - Settlement Negotiations The settlement was achieved at two meetings (the settlement meetings) involving petitioner and William Maitland, Nomura’s chief legal officer. The settlement meetings occurred around the close of 1997. At one of the settlement meetings, petitioner offered to settle, telling Mr. Maitland that he would not take anything less than $2 million. He justified that sum to Mr. Maitland based on a bonus he thought due him, interest, legal fees, and a charitable contribution he wished Nomura to make. To settle the arbitration proceeding, Mr. Maitland agreed that Nomura would pay petitioner $1.9 million and, on his behalf, contribute $100,000 to charity (together, the settlement payment). Petitioner agreed to end the arbitration proceeding. Petitioner and Mr. Maitland did not discuss how the settlement payment would be allocated among the claims made by petitioner. Mr. Maitland did not intend any part of the settlement payment to be for any particular claim that petitioner had made. Petitioner did not provide to Mr. Maitland any bills or invoices for legal fees at either meeting. The Settlement Agreement On January 14, 1998, Nomura and petitioner executed a Settlement Agreement and General Release (the settlement agreement) by which the parties agreed to execute a stipulation with respect to the arbitration proceeding that “all of thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011