James Edward Briggsdaniels - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          Juvenile Hall and the Harold Holden Ranch for Boys, a Santa Clara           
          County juvenile facility.                                                   
               During portions of 1997, Jamar was in the custody of Santa             
          Clara Juvenile Hall and the Harold Holden Ranch for Boys.                   
               Petitioner introduced no evidence to establish amounts                 
          contributed by him as support for James, Jr., Jeremy, and Jamar.            
          Discussion                                                                  
               Respondent’s determination is generally presumed to be                 
          correct, and petitioner bears the burden of proving that it is              
          incorrect.  Rule 142(a);1  Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115            
          (1933).2                                                                    
          Issue 1.  Head of Household                                                 
               Petitioner claimed head of household filing status for 1997            
          and 1998.  Section 2(b)(1)(A) provides that a person shall be               
          considered a head of household if he is not married and provides            
          over half the cost of maintaining as his home a household that              




               1All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice            
          and Procedure, and all section references are to the Internal               
          Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, unless otherwise             
          indicated.                                                                  
               2Although respondent’s examination of the 1998 taxable year            
          commenced after July 22, 1998, sec. 7491 does not necessarily               
          shift the burden of proof to respondent on any of the issues in             
          the case.  The stipulation of facts was prepared by respondent              
          using documents that respondent had obtained from sources other             
          than petitioner, and petitioner did not introduce any credible              
          evidence with respect to any of the issues in the case.                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011