- 29 -
Street property, petitioner and Ms. Brodsky were responsible for
paying any expenditures with respect to that property in propor-
tion to their investment interest therein.
Included within the total deposits during 1991 into peti-
tioner’s UVW account were the following deposits, which included
one or two checks, a portion of which was deposited into that
account and a portion of which was negotiated for cash:
Amount
Date of Amount of Negotiated
Deposit Description and Payor of Item DepositedDeposit for Cash
2/12/91 Check for $10,000 from Mr. Dubrovsky and$14,195 ---
Ms. Dubrovsky, check for $795 from Conti-
nental Video System, and 2 cash deposits
totaling $3,400
3/11/91 Money order for $975 from Mr. Dubrovsky2,515 ---
and 2 cash deposits totaling $1,540
8/22/91 Check for $1,224 from S&J Co.1 and check2,734 $70
for $1,580 from West Coast Video
1During 1986 and as of the time of the further trial in this case, Mr.
Dubrovsky was a part owner of S&J Co. The record does not disclose whether
Mr. Dubrovsky owned any part of S&J Co. on Aug. 22, 1991.
On the dates shown below, the following checks that were
payable to Mr. Dubrovsky were drawn on petitioner’s UVW account:
Date of Check Check No. Amount
2/13/92 0671 $1,000
4/16/92 0752 1,000
On the dates shown below, the following checks that were
payable to Mr. Dubrovsky were drawn on petitioner’s equity line
account:
Date of Check Check No. Amount
10/20/92 0554 $2,000
1/30/93 0574 1,675
Page: Previous 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011