Holland E. Bynam - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
               The issue for decision is whether a portion of the                     
          compensation received by petitioner in his capacity as a Junior             
          Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (JROTC) instructor from a local            
          school district is excludable from gross income.2  We hold that             
          no portion of such compensation is excludable.                              
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Most of the facts have been stipulated, and they are so                
          found.  Petitioner resided in Houston, Texas, at the time that              
          his petition was filed with the Court.                                      
          Petitioner’s Career                                                         
               After graduating from college, petitioner entered military             
          service in 1957 as a lieutenant in the U.S. Army.  Twenty-six               
          years later, in 1983, petitioner retired from active duty as a              
          colonel, having attained that rank in 1979.                                 
               Upon retirement from active duty, petitioner became entitled           
          to receive retired pay from the Army.  However, as a retired                
          military officer, petitioner was no longer entitled to receive              
          (and never in fact received) any military allowances, such as a             
          basic allowance for quarters, a basic allowance for subsistence,            
          or a variable housing allowance.                                            
               In August 1987, petitioner was hired by the Houston                    
          Independent School District (HISD) as a JROTC instructor.  Since            


               2 An adjustment to petitioner’s itemized deductions is a               
          mechanical matter, the resolution of which depends on our                   
          disposition of the disputed issue.  See sec. 67(a).                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011