- 7 - Accordingly, we sustain respondent's determination that petitioner is not entitled to a dependency exemption deduction for Amanda in 1998. 2. Head of Household Filing Status Respondent determined petitioner’s filing status to be single rather than head of household for 1998 because Amanda did not reside with petitioner for more than one-half of the year. Section 1(b) imposes a special tax rate on individuals filing as head of household. As relevant herein, head of household is defined in section 2(b) as an unmarried individual who maintains his home as the principal place of abode for a son or daughter for more than half of the taxable year. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he maintained such a household. Petitioner’s own testimony indicated that he failed to maintain a principal place of abode for Amanda for more than one-half of 1998: “From January 1st until [the middle of] June 1998." To qualify, petitioner needed to prove, at a minimum, that he provided the principal place of abode for Amanda from January 1 until July 2, 1998. He testified further that Amanda did not stay at his house more than half of the week during that period. He acknowledged that during the periods of the year where Amanda did not reside at his abode, she stayed with Ms. Macera. Furthermore, petitioner failed to present any evidence in addition to his own testimony regarding his entitlement toPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011