Kevin D. Castro and Margarita C. Castro, et al. - Page 15




                                       - 15 -                                         
          the Commissioner, subject to certain limitations, where a                   
          taxpayer introduces credible evidence with respect to factual               
          issues relevant to ascertaining that taxpayer’s tax liability.              
          See Ashley v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-376.                            
               The record contains very little evidence regarding the                 
          commencement date of the examination in this case.  Respondent’s            
          notices of deficiency to each of the trusts included a form                 
          prepared by the examining agent entitled “Income Tax Examination            
          Changes”, dated August 27, 1998, which supports a finding that              
          the examination began sometime before that date.  Testimony                 
          elicited by petitioners supports an inference that the                      
          examination in question began before July 1998.  Petitioner                 
          testified that he met his current tax adviser, Kevin Allison, in            
          early 1997.  Mr. Allison testified that he and the Castros met              
          approximately 6 months before petitioners’ audit began.  This               
          testimony, while vague, suggests that the instant examinations              
          commenced before July 22, 1998.                                             
               In contrast to the evidence described above, there is                  
          nothing in the record that allows us to conclude that the                   
          examination in these cases commenced after July 22, 1998.                   
          Petitioners have failed to convince us that section 7491 applies            
          to shift the burden of proof to respondent.  We hold, therefore,            
          that the burden of proof is upon petitioners to prove                       
          respondent's determinations are erroneous.  See Rule 142(a);                
          Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).                               





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011