- 3 - Sheridan property and the purchase of the Montrose and Pratt properties. Mr. Mader prepared the Schedules K-1, Partner’s Share of Income, Credits, Deductions, Etc., reflecting each partner’s distributive share of that gain. Petitioner’s Schedule K-1 reflected a gain in the amount of $61,983. Petitioner did not report the $61,983 on her Federal income tax return for 1993. Respondent determined, inter alia, that petitioner should have reported the $61,983 as a capital gain pursuant to section 61(a)(13). Section 702(c) provides that in any case where it is necessary to determine the gross income of a partner for purposes of this title, such amount shall include his distributive share of the gross income of the partnership. Petitioner states that she did not receive a cash distribution but that is irrelevant under the statute. Each partner is taxable upon his or her distributive share of the partnership profits, whether or not distributed. Sec. 702; sec. 1.702-1(a), Income Tax Regs. Or to put it another way, a partner is taxable on his or her distributive or proportionate shares of partnership income, irrespective of whether that income is actually distributed to him or her. United States v. Basye, 410 U.S. 441, 447-8, 454 (1973); Cipparone v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1985-234. In the instant case, it appears that the Partnership reinvested petitioner’s share of the gain.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011