Fredie Lynn Charlton - Page 2




                                         -2-                                          

               Held: deductions related to Medi-Task are                              
               allocable to H.  See sec. 6015(d)(3), I.R.C.                           
                    Held, further, R’s determination that H was                       
               entitled to relief under sec. 6015(f), I.R.C., was not                 
               an abuse of discretion.                                                

               Fredie Lynn Charlton, pro se.                                          
               Sarah K. Hawthorne, pro se.                                            
               Carl D. Inskeep, Sheila R. Pattison, Deborah H. Delgado, and           
          Lewis J. Hubbard, for respondent.                                           


                           SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OPINION                            
               COLVIN, Judge:  This matter is before us to resolve a                  
          dispute arising in the Rule 1551 computations submitted by                  
          petitioner Fredie Lynn Charlton (Charlton) and respondent.                  
          Charlton sought relief under section 6015.2                                 
               Following concessions,3 we must decide the following issues:           




               1  Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice              
          and Procedure.  Section references are to the Internal Revenue              
          Code in effect during 1994, except section 6015, which was                  
          enacted in 1998.                                                            
               2  Docket No. 11861-98, the case of Sarah K. Hawthorne,                
          formerly known as Sarah K. Charlton and now known as Sarah K.               
          Mayor, was consolidated with this case for trial, briefing, and             
          opinion.                                                                    
               3  The parties agree that the total deficiency is $15,192.             
          They dispute whether $8,320 of that amount should be allocable to           
          Charlton, Hawthorne, or jointly to both of them under sec.                  
          6015(d).                                                                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011