- 2 - upon the following expenses: $60.00 for the filing fee and $3,860 for attorney's fees. An objection to petitioner's motion by respondent was filed. Neither party requested a hearing on petitioners' motion. Rule 232(a). Accordingly, we rule on petitioners' motion on the basis of the parties' submissions and the record in this case. The underlying issues raised in the petition were settled by a stipulation of settlement. At the time the petition was filed, petitioners resided in San Antonio, Texas. By notice of deficiency, respondent determined deficiencies in petitioners' Federal income taxes of $7,182, $3,290, and $3,378 for the taxable years 1995, 1996, and 1997, respectively. Under section 7430, a taxpayer may be awarded a judgment for reasonable litigation costs if the taxpayer establishes certain criteria and if respondent’s position was not substantially justified. Respondent concedes that petitioner substantially prevailed for purposes of section 7430(c)(4)(A)(i). However, respondent maintains that his position was substantially justified, that petitioners did not exhaust their administrative remedies, that petitioners unreasonably protracted the Court proceeding, and that the costs claimed are not reasonable. Because of our disposition of this issue, we need only address whether respondent's position was substantially justified. In deciding the merits of a motion for litigation costs, thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011