- 8 - 465, 469 (1935). However, transactions that have no significant purpose other than to avoid tax and that do not reflect economic reality will not be recognized for Federal income tax purposes. Zmuda v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 714, 719 (1982), affd. 731 F.2d 1417 (9th Cir. 1984); Markosian v. Comissioner, 73 T.C. 1235, 1245 (1980); see also Furman v. Commissioner, 45 T.C. 360, 364- 366 (1966), affd. 381 F.2d 22 (5th Cir. 1967). Where the form of a transaction has not altered any cognizable economic relationships, we look through the form of the transaction and apply the tax law according to the transaction’s substance. Markosian v. Commissioner, supra at 1241. This principle applies regardless of whether the transaction creates an entity with separate existence under State law. Zmuda v. Commissioner, supra at 720; see also Furman v. Commissioner, supra at 364. In deciding whether a purported trust lacks economic substance, we consider the following factors: (1) Whether the taxpayer’s relationship, as grantor, to property purportedly transferred into trust differed materially before and after the trust’s formation; (2) whether the trust had a bona fide independent trustee; (3) whether an economic interest in the trust passed to trust beneficiaries other than the grantor; and (4) whether the taxpayer honored restrictions imposed by the trust or by the law of trusts. See Markosian v. Commissioner, supra at 1243-1245.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011