Willie Clayborn, Jr. and Jacqulyn A. Clayborn - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         
          effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the            
          Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.                                  
               Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners’ Federal             
          income tax of $2,340 for the taxable year 1997.                             
               The sole issue for decision is whether certain Social                  
          Security disability benefits are includable in petitioners’ gross           
          income.                                                                     
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulations of fact and the attached exhibits are                      
          incorporated herein by this reference.  Petitioners resided in              
          Richmond, California, on the date the petition was filed in this            
          case.                                                                       
               Petitioners filed a joint Federal income tax return for                
          taxable year 1997.  They reported $58,534 in adjusted gross                 
          income on the return.  They received $13,857 in Social Security             
          disability benefits in 1997, but did not report any portion of              
          this amount on their return.  Respondent issued petitioners a               
          statutory notice of deficiency with the determination that they             
          had unreported income of $11,778 from the Social Security                   
          benefits.1                                                                  



          1Respondent also determined that petitioners had unreported                 
          income of $17 in interest and $52 in dividends.  Respondent                 
          concedes the interest adjustment and petitioners do not dispute             
          the dividends adjustment.                                                   






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011