Bruce David Cohen - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
          incorporated herein by this reference.  At the time the petition            
          was filed in this case, petitioner resided in Dana Point,                   
          California.                                                                 
               From 1984 through 1999, petitioner operated a sole                     
          proprietorship under the name of Dana Point Bicycle Sport                   
          (Bicycle Sport).  Bicycle Sport was an independent bicycle retail           
          store engaged primarily in the business of selling new bicycles             
          and bicycle-related products to consumers and of repairing                  
          bicycles.                                                                   
               Petitioner failed to timely file Federal income tax returns            
          or to pay any estimated taxes for the years at issue.  As a                 
          result, a revenue agent with the Internal Revenue Service,                  
          Darrell Cavender, contacted petitioner in 1994 in an attempt to             
          secure the delinquent returns.  When petitioner failed to submit            
          the requested returns, notices of deficiency based on records               
          obtained from third parties were issued to petitioner for the               
          subject years on April 29, 1996.                                            
               Thereafter, on October 26, 1998, petitioner filed tax                  
          returns for all 6 years.  Through the information provided on               
          such returns and additional financial materials obtained,                   
          respondent concluded that the amounts for which petitioner was              
          determined to be liable should be reduced.  At initial hearings             
          in this case on March 20 and 27, 2000, respondent communicated to           
          the Court the following revised amounts in dispute:                         






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011