- 15 - are willing to assume that $89,728.73 was applied for the benefit of LINKS. Conversely, the record fails to trace the remaining $84,404.47 canceled to any use benefiting LINKS. Furthermore, the evidence shows that the amounts supplied by Mr. Combrink to LINKS, both through COST and from personal sources, were initially characterized as debt, not equity. Mr. Combrink owned 100 percent of the outstanding LINKS stock prior to any such remittances and did not at the time of these loans to LINKS receive any additional shares or equity. Only subsequently was $175,000.00 of the $252,481.03 once represented by promissory notes from LINKS to Mr. Combrink redesignated as additional paid- in capital. Although we are willing in these circumstances to accept this recapitalization as establishing that $175,000.00 was used to acquire LINKS stock within the meaning of section 304(b)(3)(B)(i), $77,481.03 still remained outstanding in the form of debt. Since the $89,728.73 portion of the assumed liability that can be traced to LINKS exceeds this $77,481.03 that clearly was intended to represent debt rather than equity in LINKS by only $12,247.70, we are able to determine from the record only that $12,247.70 of the $174,133.20 assumed by COST was used to acquire stock or equity in LINKS. As to this $12,247.70 amount, we hold that petitioners are entitled to the section 304(b)(3)(B) exception. With respect to the remaining $161,885.50, petitioners have failed to carry theirPage: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011