- 40 - 6651(a)(1) additions do not apply; respondent’s determination with respect to those additions is sustained. Section 6662 Respondent has determined that Mr. Comey is liable for accuracy-related penalties to tax for 1991 and 1992 attributable to negligence or disregard of rules or regulations, see sec. 6662(a) and (b)(1). Mr. Comey bears the burden of proving that an exception applies or that respondent’s determination is otherwise erroneous. See Rule 142(a); ASAT, Inc. v. Commissioner, supra. Petitioners have neither argued nor introduced evidence suggesting that an exception to the accuracy-related penalties applies. Accordingly, petitioners have failed to show that the section 6662 penalties do not apply; respondent’s determination with respect to those penalties is sustained. To reflect all the foregoing, Decisions will be entered for respondent.12 12 As explained supra note 9, respondent has also issued a notice to Landtrak for 1991 and 1992. That notice included in Landtrak’s income the items we have concluded were Mr. Comey’s income. The Court expects, notwithstanding the obstacles that respondent may encounter in attempting to collect from petitioners, that in any calculations of the amounts owed by petitioners, respondent will treat any amounts collected from Landtrak in accordance with this opinion.Page: Previous 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Last modified: May 25, 2011