- 8 - During 1996, 1997, and 1998, petitioner maintained as her home a household at the South Parsons Avenue address. This home was owned by petitioner’s grandmother, who contributed to the cost of maintaining the household. However, petitioner had greater financial resources than her grandmother, and it was petitioner who paid most of the cost of maintaining the household. Further, during these years, petitioner received no financial assistance from Mr. Corley. During 1996 and 1997, the household at the South Parsons Avenue address constituted for more than one-half of each of those years the principal place of abode of petitioner’s son Henry. During 1996, 1997, and 1998, the household at the South Parsons Avenue address constituted for more than one-half of each of those years the principal place of abode, as a member of such household, of petitioner’s daughter Ceola and her grandmother Lillie. In view of the foregoing, we hold that petitioner’s filing status for the years in issue was head-of-household. Respondent’s determination to the contrary is therefore not sustained. B. Dependency Exemptions As relevant herein, a taxpayer is entitled to a dependency exemption for a son, daughter, or grandmother if more than half of such individuals’ support is furnished by the taxpayer. SeePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011