Norman E. Duquette, Inc. - Page 40




                                       - 40 -                                         
          any evidence as to the existence or nature of any bona fide                 
          business discussion either before or after the entertainment.               
          See sec. 1.274-2(d)(3), Income Tax Regs., sec. 1.274-5T(b)(3)(iv)           
          and (b)(4), Temporary Income Tax Regs., 50 Fed. Reg. 46015                  
          (Nov. 6, 1985).  Therefore, the entertainment expense is                    
          nondeductible.                                                              
               Item (8), the cost of insurance for the automobile, was                
          incurred on May 28, 1994, more than 4 months after the Dallas-              
          Phoenix round trip, the only demonstrated business use of the               
          auto during the audit year.  Because there is no evidence that              
          the $297 payment of automobile insurance was attributable to                
          other than periods of personal use of the auto during the 1994              
          tax year, we find that no portion of this payment constitutes a             
          deductible expense under section 162(a).                                    
               Petitioner argues that item (9), a premium for life                    
          insurance on Norman’s life, was purchased pursuant to a company             
          plan or policy adopted on February 6, 1992, by Norman acting in             
          his capacity as petitioner’s president (the plan).  The plan                
          provided for "[l]ife insurance offered through American Express             
          on the life of * * * [Norman]", and was limited to life insurance           
          "covering accidents while traveling".  There is no evidence as to           
          the amount of the insurance in question.  Apparently, the                   
          proceeds of the policy were payable to petitioner:  “The proceeds           
          from the policy will be used to effect an orderly business                  






Page:  Previous  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011