John D. Fairchild - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
               After concessions,2 we must decide the following issues:               
               1.  Whether we have jurisdiction to decide whether                     
          petitioner’s 1993 tax liabilities were discharged in his 1999               
          bankruptcy proceeding.  We hold that we do not.  Neilson v.                 
          Commissioner, 94 T.C. 1, 8-9 (1990).                                        
               2.  Whether petitioner may deduct taxes and wages in amounts           
          greater than respondent allowed.  We hold that he may not.                  
               3.  Whether petitioner is liable for self-employment tax on            
          income that he received from his business in 1993.  We hold that            
          he is.                                                                      
               4.  Whether petitioner recognized $5,369 of capital gain               
          income from the sale of stock in 1993.  We hold that he did.                
               5.  Whether petitioner is liable for the addition to tax               
          under section 6651(a)(1) for failure to timely file his 1993                
          return.  We hold that he is.                                                
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          A.   Petitioner                                                             
               Petitioner lived in Hurricane, West Virginia, when he filed            
          the petition in this case.  He was married in 1993 and divorced             
          in 1995.                                                                    




               2  Respondent concedes that petitioner is entitled to a                
          dependency exemption for his spouse and that disability insurance           
          proceeds are not taxable income.                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011